Skip to main content
AI Autopilot — +6% throughput in a 25-day AI-versus-manual test at Mineração Aurizona (CMOC Group) — published in Brasil Mineral #441.See Cases
Brainiall
  • Products
  • Sectors
  • Demo
  • Cases
  • Why Us
Sign InTry Live Demo
Brainiall
AI that runs the real economy. Mining. Industrial. Voice. Bootstrapped since 2019.
Products
  • AI Autopilot
  • Specialist AIs
Sectors
  • Industrial
  • Mining
  • Energy
  • Technology
Company
  • About
  • Why Choose Us
  • Cases
  • Articles
  • Changelog
  • Contact Us
Resources
  • Pricing
  • Developer APIs
  • Docs
  • Integrations
  • Compare
  • Trust Center
  • DPA
  • MSA
  • Status

Stay updated

Specialist AI insights, delivered weekly.

© 2026 Brainiall, Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy PolicyTerms of Use
Back to Case Studies
Named customer · +6% throughputMineração Aurizona (MASA) — gold mine and processing plant in Maranhão, Brazil; part of CMOC Group since January 2026

Mineração Aurizona — AI Autopilot on the Gold Grinding Circuit

Illustrative image of a mineral processing plant
Illustrative image

The company

Mineração Aurizona (MASA) runs a gold mine and processing plant in Maranhão, Brazil. Since January 2026 it belongs to CMOC Group — the world’s largest cobalt producer and one of the top eight copper producers, listed in Hong Kong and Shanghai — as part of a US$1.015 billion acquisition.

The test described here ran from January 10 to February 5, 2024.

Challenge

The grinding circuit set the pace of the whole plant — and manual control was limiting its throughput and consistency. Operators could not hold optimal setpoints 24/7 as rock type, feed blend and percent solids shifted underneath them.

Method

25-day controlled test (January 10 – February 5, 2024) on the same grinding circuit, alternating AI-guided and manual operation in 48-hour cycles to control for rock type, feed blend, percent solids and operating rates.

Only periods with ≥85% active operational hours entered the analysis — 265 operational hours per mode — ensuring a like-for-like comparison. The test followed a two-year collaboration between Brainiall and the producer, and was delivered in partnership with SoftwareOne on AWS cloud infrastructure.

Inside the circuit

A predictive model of the grinding circuit, built over two years with the plant’s process engineers, ran the AI Autopilot. It read the circuit’s live process data and sent setpoints straight to the plant’s automation system in real time, inside safe operating ranges, 24/7.

One click returned control to the operator, and the safety systems were untouched throughout the test.

Results

  • 435 t/h (AI) vs 412 t/h (manual) — +6% throughput
  • 115,347 tons processed under AI vs 109,079 tons under manual, over matched 265-hour windows
  • +3% on hard ore (Wi ≥ 14 kWh/t), above plant design rates
  • Particle size (p80) practically the same — less equipment stress and more predictable downstream flotation recovery
  • Specific energy fell ~2% per ton: 20.7 vs 21.1 kWh/t (test report)
  • ≈2,694 additional ounces/year — ≈$781K incremental annual profit (net of AISC)

Results may vary with ore grade and operating conditions.

Client confirmation

In September 2026, Mineração Aurizona confirmed in writing that the solution was implemented and evaluated under real operating conditions, delivered consistent results and met the criteria defined for the test.

Sources

Mining Productivity Study — Brasil Mineral #441 (Jul 2024)SoftwareOne case study

Your operation could be next.

A paid engagement, delivered as consulting or as the first stage of a project: under NDA, we study your process data and deliver a prioritised opportunity map and a measurement plan for a controlled AI-versus-manual test.

Book a plant assessment